In our rapidly evolving world of business and technology advancements, the organizational change landscape must also adapt and change leveraging robust frameworks. This discussion provides insights from Lewin’s Change Model and Kotter’s 8-Stage Change Model. In this review I emphasize their relevance and applicability across various settings, including healthcare and education to demonstrate the value they offer to modern leaders grappling with dynamic and complex changes under their direction.
Lewin’s Change Model
Lewin’s change model is fundamental, focusing on unfreezing, changing, and refreezing processes within organizations (Endrejat & Burnes, 2024). Unfreezing, the first step in Lewin’s change model, involves breaking down existing mindsets and beliefs creating motivation for change. Lewin believed that change could only occur when individuals or organizations were willing to let go of their current state and embrace new possibilities. The second step in Lewin’s change model is ‘moving’. This step encompasses the actual process of change. It involves implementing capabilities, processes, and structures that align with the need for the change. Lewin emphasized the importance of actively involving individuals in the change process, while providing them the necessary support and resources, to facilitate the transition. The final step in Lewin’s change model, refreezing, solidifies the change and makes it a permanent part of the organization. This involves reinforcing the newly introduce changes so they become the new norm. Lewin believed that refreezing was necessary to prevent individuals or organizations from reverting back to their old ways.
The adaptation of Lewin’s model by Edgar Schein to incorporate sociopsychological elements highlights its versatility (Coghlan, 2020). Schein’s extension of Lewin’s model emphasizes the necessity of creating motivation and psychological safety for change to be internalized effectively, illustrating the model’s depth beyond its original simplicity.
Kotter’s Change Model
Kotter’s change model is comprised of eight (8) elements as explained throughout the article by Mouazen et al. (2024):
- Establish a sense of urgency: This step involves creating a well understood, compelling case for change to motivate employees by understanding the necessity to change and the potential negative impacts of not taking action.
- Create a guiding coalition: In this step, an influential group of team members is formed to lead the change. The team characteristics including the necessary skills, knowledge, credentials, and authority to drive the intended change.
- Develop a vision and strategy: The guiding coalition collaboratively develop a clear vision and a strategy to achieve the vision for change.
- Communicate the change vision: The vision and strategy are then communicated to all members of the organization. This step involves developing a clear, universal understanding of the various reasons for change, as well as, the desired outcomes of the change.
- Empower broad-based action: To implement the change, employees across regardless of role or title need to be empowered to take action. This step involves removing obstacles, providing resources, encouraging innovation, and risk-taking.
- Generate short-term wins: To build and sustain momentum, it is important to create and celebrate small victories throughout the change implementation. This step involves attainment of identified short-term goals that align with the overall change vision.
- Consolidate gains and produce more change: Once early wins have been achieved, the opportunity to build on and continue driving the change forward emerges. This requires change leaders and the guiding coalition to analyze what worked well, adjusting the approach as necessary, and identifying additional change opportunities.
- Anchor new approaches in the culture: The final step is to ensure that the changes become embedded in the organization’s culture. This involves reinforcing the new capabilities, values, and practices through focused communications and recognitions.
Kotter’s 8-Stage Change Model provides a detailed strategy for enacting complex change on a large scale. This was demonstrated by its application in Wake Forest University School of Medicine’s shift to virtual recruitment during the COVID-19 pandemic (Miles et al., 2023). The adaptions made by Wake Forest help to maintain program fill rates and improved candidate engagement, showcasing the model’s effectiveness addressing complex scenarios like a global health crisis.
The integration of these models in various contexts demonstrates their adaptability and positive impact. In the research article, “Transformational and Transactional Leaders and Their Role in Implementing the Kotter Change Management Model” by Mouazen et al. (2024) the authors underscore the significance of leadership styles in facilitating or hindering the change process, aligning with Kotter’s emphasis on creating a guiding coalition as a critical step in the change model. This insight highlights the interplay between leadership and change management strategies, further enriching the practical application of Kotter’s model in organizational contexts.
Moreover, in the article by Sittrop and Crosthwaite, “Minimising Risk—The Application of Kotter’s Change Management Model on Customer Relationship Management Systems” (2021) the authors illustrate the model’s applicability beyond healthcare, into areas such as customer relationship management, reinforcing Kotter’s framework as a versatile tool for navigating change across various industries. Similarly, the exploration of Lewin’s model by Islam (2023) in the context of modern challenges, reveals its relevance in guiding organizations through rapid transitions induced by external crises. Islam’s work highlights how Lewin’s foundational principles can be applied to contemporary organizational dilemmas, offering a roadmap for stability in times of uncertainty. In contrast, Endrejat and Burnes (2024) delves into the practical application of Lewin’s model in educational settings, providing a tangible methodology for enacting change within academic institutions. They show that Lewin’s approach demonstrates the model’s adaptability and effectiveness in fostering educational innovation and responsiveness.
Conclusion
The examination of Lewin’s Change Model and Kotter’s 8-Stage Change Model through these six sources underscores the frameworks’ comprehensive applicability and robustness in addressing organizational change. By marrying the theoretical underpinnings of Lewin’s model with the actionable steps outlined by Kotter organizations are equipped with a multifaceted approach to navigating the complexities of change.
References
Basthomi, Y. A., Sunandar, A., & Timan, A. (2023). Instructional Leadership Role Through Kurt Lewin’s Model to Enhance Culture of Change in Teacher Capabilities. Jurnal Educative : Journal of Educational Studies., 8(2). https://doi.org/10.30983/educative.v8i2.7464
Coghlan, D. (2021). Edgar Schein on Change: Insights Into the Creation of a Model. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 57(1), 11-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886320924029
Endrejat, P. C., & Burnes, B. (2024). Draw it, check it, change it: Reviving lewin’s topology to facilitate organizational change theory and practice. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 60(1), 87-112. https://doi.org/10.1177/00218863221122875
Islam, M. N. (2023). Managing organizational change in responding to global crises. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 42(3), 42-57. https://doi.org/10.1002/joe.22189
Miles, M., Richardson, K., Wolfe, R., Hairston, K., Cleveland, M., Kelly, C., Lippert, J., Mastandrea, N., & Pruitt, Z. (2023). Using Kotter’s Change Management Framework to Redesign Departmental GME Recruitment.. Journal of graduate medical education, 15 1, 98-104 . https://doi.org/10.4300/jgme-d-22-00191.1.
Mouazen, A. M., Hernández-Lara, A. B., Abdallah, F., Ramadan, M., Chahine, J., Baydoun, H., & Bou Zakhem, N. (2024). Transformational and transactional leaders and their role in implementing the kotter change management model ensuring sustainable change: An empirical study. Sustainability (Basel, Switzerland), 16(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16010016
Sittrop, D., & Crosthwaite, C. (2021). Minimising risk: The application of kotter’s change management model on customer relationship management systems. A case study. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(10), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14100496
Leave a Reply